Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR PHILIP COPPEL (instructed by Treasury Solicitors, London SW1H 9JS) appeared on behalf of the Appellant MR CHRISTOPHER KATKOWSKI QC AND MS GALINA WARD (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, London EC4Y 1HS) appeared on behalf of the Respondents ____________________
Those are the critical paragraphs, but I should also read paragraph 99 of the appendix (replicating paragraph 31 of the policy):
In paragraph 10 he acknowledged that the proposed installation would comply with ICNIRP guidelines, and that indeed is common ground. He then proceeded thus:
(Appeal dismissed; Appellant do pay Respondents' costs, such costs to be the subject of detailed assessment).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.