Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This appeal originates in an unsuccessful application for an entry clearance visa by Yunme Kismet (hereinafter � the Appellant �). The Appellant is, according to the evidence, married to Margaret Ingrid Crawford (hereinafter � the sponsor �). The application for a settlement visa was made on 28 th June 2012. This resulted in a refusal decision of the Entry Clearance Officer (� the ECO �), dated 3 rd September 2012. This decision was subsequently affirmed, on review, by the Entry Clearance Manager, on 26 th February 2013.
The gist of the ECO�s refusal was that the application did not satisfy the requirements of paragraph 281 of the Immigration Rules. On appeal, the First-tier Tribunal (� the FtT �) made the following material findings:
(c) The Northern Ireland Housing Executive (� NIHE �), landlord of the dwelling house in which the sponsor resides with her four children, would probably permit the Appellant to reside there.
(d) However, there is no evidence that this property is � certified to be suitable and would not be subject to overcrowding �, given particularly the absence of a surveyor�s report.
(e) The Appellant will require recourse to public funds in order to be maintained.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.