Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Richard Harrison K.C and Ms Samantha Ridley (instructed by Kelly Family Law Solicitors) for the Applicant Ms Deirdre Fottrell K.C and Mr Tom Wilson (instructed by instructed by Farrer & Co LLP ) for the 1st Respondent Ms Sharon Segal (instructed by Goodman Ray) for the 2nd & 3rd Respondents Ms Maria Stanley (instructed by Cafcass) for the 4th Respondent Hearing date: 29th June 2023 Judgment: 4 July 2023 ____________________
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published. The anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
(1) A's application for permission to withdraw her application for wardship dated 3 April 2023 and her application for a parental order dated 2 June 2023.
(2) A's application for leave under section 10(9) Children Act 1989 [CA 1989] to make an application for a child arrangements order in relation to Y, now aged 4 months.
�I think it's positive that you are taking all these steps for advice and, as [the ISW] suggested, I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this as well as many other important matters relating to [X] in mediation.'
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.