Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
RP was a litigant in person together with AP and Mr John Hemming MP as McKenzie friends Shona Rogers (instructed by City Council) for the 1st Respondent Peter Jackson QC and Robin Barda (onstructed by the Official Solicitor) for the 2nd Respondent Hearing date: 4th March 2008 ____________________
Events since my judgment on RP's permission application was handed down on 30 January 2008
RP's argument that she did not know that she was being represented by the Official Solicitor
The references to the "OS" in these attendance notes are plainly references to the Official Solicitor.
SC obviously had considerable difficulty in obtaining RP's instructions on the two documents: indeed, she records RP refusing to comment on the social worker's statement.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.