Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Chana ('the Judge') sent to the parties on 22 May 2022, dismissing his international protection appeal.
             By an order dated 14 July 2023, Upper Tribunal Judge Keith granted the appellant anonymity and issued reporting restrictions.
             Neither representative requested that the anonymity order be set aside. I observe that this appeal concerns international protection matters and so I conclude that the appellant's rights protected under article 8 ECHR presently outweigh the rights of the general public to know personal issues arising in this matter, as protected by article 10 ECHR. The order is detailed above.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.