Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Whereas the original respondent is the appealing party, I shall, in the interests of convenience and consistency, replicate the nomenclature of the decision at first instance.
The appellants appealed on December 23, 2013 under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
The matter came before Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Sweet (hereinafter referred to as the �FtTJ�) on October 16, 2014 and in a decision promulgated on October 27, 2014 he allowed the appeal under both the Immigration Rules and article 8 ECHR.
The respondent lodged grounds of appeal on October 30, 2014. She submitted the FtTJ erred by allowing the appeals by misdirecting himself in law and by failing to apply the approach in R (Nagre) v SSHD [2013] EWHC 720 (Admin) .
Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Lever granted permission to appeal on December 17, 2014 stating there was an arguable errors in law based on the grounds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.