Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appplicant, Justin Zinda, appeared in person The Respondents were not represented Hearing date: 18 April 2011 ____________________
The Cocking case, [1974] ICR 650, has nothing to do with the calling of witnesses and so provided no support for that aspect of his application.
He did not explain why the application did either of those things but said that he was relying upon it as providing 'further grounds why both my appeal against the Registrar's order and fresh notice of appeal should be allowed.' He continued:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.