Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Lord President concurred, and added, that the want of the oath was not justified by the deposition made by the same party in support of the former application, where he had been named as one of the petitioners, for quomodo constat that the debt had not been paid or discharged in the intervening period? Although not a statutory form, the oath of verity had become essential, by the constant and uniform practice in such cases.
Lord Corehouse, Ordinary. For the Suspender, P. Robertson, James Paterson. Charles Fisher, Agent. Alt. Keay, Pyper. D. Grant, Agent. B. Clerk.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.