UI2021001768

Anonymity is granted because the facts of the appeal involve a protection claim . Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.

No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.

              Pursuant to section 12 (2) (b) (ii) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, this is the remaking of the decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Lodato promulgated on the 17 December 2021 following the decision dated 22 November 2022 (promulgated on 19/12/22) of the Upper Tribunal setting aside the decision of the FtT having found a material error of law in that decision for the reasons set out in that decision. That decision is annexed to this decision marked "Annex A".

              The appellant is a citizen of Iraq of Kurdish ethnicity from the IKR. The basis of his claim is set out in the decision letter and summarised in the decision of the FtTJ.

              The basis of his claim is set out in the decision letter and summarised in the decision of the FtTJ from paragraphs 10-21. It is summarised as follows. The appellant based his protection claim on the basis of being a target of honour-based violence. The appellant worked as a shepherd on his family farm. There was a well outside his home, and he would open the cap of the well during the day for people to collect their water.