Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Estelle Lear (instructed by Pillai & Jones) for the Appellant Mr Mark Hubbard (instructed by Chesham & Co) for the Respondent Hearing date: 21 July 2017 ____________________
(1) She referred to the notice being registered to protect Rose's right to seek rectification of the register to restore her name as a joint proprietor; she stated that it was unusual that Rose had entered a unilateral notice rather than making an application for rectification of the register; she said that an application for rectification would have stood "a good chance of success": [1];
(2) She set out the background to the application and a chronology: [2] � [7]; she referred to the rival cases about the 1991 transaction at [4]; she referred to the rival cases about the 2002 transfer at [6];
(3) Between [8] and [14], under the heading "The Applicant's evidence", she set out the evidence given by Rose, both in answer to questions put by the adjudicator and in answer to cross-examination; Rose's evidence included an account of the arrangement made in 1991;
(5) At [14], she accepted Rose's evidence that she had no knowledge of the 2002 transfer until 2008;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.