Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(i)�������� the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment of �464.00 from the respondent on the basis of the information set out at Paragraph 2 below;
(ii)������� the respondent company do pay to the claimant the sum of �464.00 in respect of notice pay; and
(iii)������ the respondent company do pay to the claimant the sum of �576.60 in respect of unpaid holiday pay.
1.�������� At the start of the hearing the name of the respondent was amended to that now shown, to reflect its name at the time it stopped trading.
2(i)����� The claimant worked for the respondent company from 21 March 2005 until 21 May 2010.� She performed clerical and accounting duties.� She was made redundant on the latter date when the company ceased trading, apparently because of financial difficulties.� She therefore had five years completed service.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.