Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, [the appellant] ( and/or any member of his family, expert, witness or other person the Tribunal considers should not be identified ) is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant ( and/or other person ). Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The appellant appeals with permission a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Lodato ('the Judge') promulgated on 24 th May 2022, in which the Judge dismissed the appellant's appeal against the refusal of his application for international protection and/or leave to remain in the UK on human rights grounds.
             At [2] of the determination the Judge writes:
             Thereafter the Judge proceeded to consider the evidence that was available. At [12] the Judge writes " I have considered the evidence of material contained within the respondents hearing bundle. Despite several directions to serve in appellant's bundle, no documents were provided by him".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.