Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The decision of the tribunal is that the claimant was not contractually entitled to 12 weeks� notice of termination of employment or 12 weeks� pay in lieu of such notice.� That part of the claim is dismissed.� However, the claimant was entitled to payment in respect of 10 additional days� untaken leave.� The claimant is awarded �1,213.88.
The respondent was represented by Mr Mulqueen, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Mr O McCullough of the respondent�s Legal Service.
1.������ The claimant had been employed by the respondent as a Sports Service Manager.� He applied for and was granted voluntary enhanced redundancy.� His employment was terminated on 20 January 2012.�
(i)������ Whether the claimant had been contractually entitled to three months� notice or three months� pay in lieu of such notice on the termination of his employment on 20 January 2012?
(ii)����� Whether the claimant, on the termination of his employment, had been contractually entitled to payment for 10 days� untaken annual leave which had accumulated before the current leave year?
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.