Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE WARD LORD JUSTICE JACOB and LORD JUSTICE STANLEY BURNTON ____________________
Iain Purvis QC and Peter Prescott QC (instructed by Lovels LLP) for the Appellant Miss Charlotte May (instructed by The Treasury Solicitor) for the Respondent Hearing date: 19 August 2009 ____________________
(a)��� It did not contain an MA containing a statement referred to in Article 28(3);
(b)���� The product was not authorised in all Member States as required by Article 36(3).
Must an application for an extension contain a marketing authorisation including an Art 28(3) statement? (Article 8(1)(d)(i))
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.