Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       This is an appeal by the Secretary of State for the Home Department against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal allowing Mr Dada's appeal against the respondent's decision to refuse his human rights claim and to refuse to revoke a deportation order previously issued against him.
       For the purposes of this decision, I shall hereinafter refer to the Secretary of State as the respondent and Mr Dada as the appellant, reflecting their positions as they were in the appeal before the First-tier Tribunal.
       The appellant was then encountered in the UK on 10 November 2003 when attempting to avoid paying his fare at a railway station and was convicted and fined for the offence on 2 April 2004. He was next encountered on 30 June 2004 in possession of a counterfeit Dutch passport attempting to defraud a bank having, he claimed, entered the UK illegally earlier that month.
       On 31 March 2011 the appellant applied to have his deportation order revoked. His application was refused on 28 September 2011. His appeal against that decision was dismissed on 9 February 2012 and permission to appeal against this decision was dismissed on 23 May 2012.
       On 21 September 2021 the appellant applied once again to have his deportation order revoked. His application was refused on 11 January 2023 and it is his appeal against that decision which has given rise to these proceedings.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.