Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       The appellant is a citizen of Pakistan born on 9 October 2001. He appeals, with permission, against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing his appeal against the respondent's decision to refuse his application for an EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) Family Permit.
       The appellant sought permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on two grounds: firstly, that the judge had failed to consider whether Article 18(d) was applicable and that she had failed to make clear findings with respect to Article 18(e) and (d) of the Withdrawal Agreement; and secondly, that the judge had failed to make adequate findings with respect to Article 8.
       Permission was granted on all grounds, but with particular reference to ground one.
       The respondent filed and served a rule 24 response opposing the appeal and relying upon Celik (EU exit, marriage, human rights) [2022] UKUT 220 .
       The appeal was stayed awaiting the judgement of the Court of appeal in Celik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWCA Civ 921 . Judgement was given in Celik on 31 July 2023.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.