Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Whereas the respondent is the appealing party, I shall, in the interests of convenience and consistency, replicate the nomenclature of the decision at first instance.
On December 17, 2013 the Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal under Section 82(1) Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (hereinafter called the 2002 Act), as amended. The matter came before Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Majid (hereinafter called �the FtTJ�) on August 8, 2014 and he allowed the appeal after an oral hearing in a determination promulgated on August 26, 2014.
The respondent lodged grounds of appeal on September 2, 2014. Permission to appeal was granted by Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Colyer on October 7, 2014. He found it arguable there was an error of law because the FtTJ had failed to make any substantive findings of fact and the determination was utterly inadequate.
The matter came before me on the date set out above. The appellant was in attendance and represented by his counsel.
This was a respondent appeal and the main thrust of the grounds was that the FtTJ failed to make any findings. I have read the determination carefully and whilst the FtTJ recounted the appellant�s case and submissions made on his behalf he failed to make any findings whatsoever on the issues that were before him.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.