Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal to the Upper Tribunal, with permission, by the Respondent with regard to a determination of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Kainth) promulgated on 20 th May 2014. For the sake of clarity and continuity however, I shall continue to refer to the Entry Clearance Officer as the Respondent and Mr Musaji as the Appellant.
The Appellant is a citizen of India born on 26 th January 1984. He made an application for leave to enter the UK as a spouse under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules. The application was rejected in a decision dated 29 th May 2013.
The Appellant appealed and the appeal came before the First-tier Tribunal on 6 th May 2014.
The refusal was on the basis that the Entry Clearance Officer was not satisfied that the Appellant�s relationship with his Sponsor was genuine and subsisting or that they intended to live permanently together in the UK. That was the sole issue.
The First-tier Tribunal heard oral evidence from the Sponsor and was shown wedding and engagement photographs together with evidence of the Sponsor�s visits to India and of text, e-mails and �WhatsApp� communications. At paragraph 31 the Judge says:-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.