Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity. The reason for this is that the appeal relates to a claimed fear of persecution based on the appellant's sexuality.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              This is the remaking of the decision in the appellant's appeal against the respondent's refusal of his protection claim.
             On 17 th June 2015, the appellant applied for leave to remain based on a right to respect for his family and private life, which the respondent rejected on 18 th August 2015. This was because the appellant had failed to meet the destitution criteria to qualify for a fee waiver.
             On 24 th August 2015, the appellant applied for a second time for leave to remain, which was refused on 23 rd January 2016.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.