Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant:�������� Giles Goodfellow QC and Philippe Freund of counsel, instructed by Fieldfisher
For the Respondents: �� Adam Tolley QC and Sadiya Choudhury of counsel, instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to HM Revenue and Customs
             ESL and other companies providing similar services are often referred to as umbrella companies.� One of the reasons for this is that these companies aim to act as the employer of the relevant individuals across multiple assignments and not just in respect of one particular job.
             The key issue in this appeal is whether ESL employs the relevant individuals on a continuous basis under an overarching or umbrella contract of employment which covers all of the various assignments undertaken by a particular employee through ESL and includes any gaps between those assignments (including periods where the individual may be working for another employer) or whether there is a series of separate contracts of employment in respect of each individual assignment.
             Having carried out investigations, HMRC�s conclusion in this case is that there is no overarching contract of employment so that the payments relating to expenses are subject to income tax under the PAYE system and to NIC.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.