Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful discrimination on the ground of sex by reason of her pregnancy.� The tribunal awards the claimant compensation of �25,400.29.
The claimant was represented by Ms L Jones, Solicitor, of Higgins Hollywood Deazley, Solicitors.
1.�������� The tribunal received evidence from the claimant.� There were not any witnesses or evidence adduced on behalf of the respondent.� The claimant also produced a bundle of documents comprising 65 pages, a schedule of loss and a Case Management Discussion Record of Proceedings of 4 January 2016.�
2.�������� (1)������ The claimant claimed that she had been unfairly dismissed by the respondent; that she had suffered discrimination on the ground of her sex and that she had suffered an unlawful deduction from her wages.
(3)������ At today�s hearing the respondent was not in attendance nor represented.� The tribunal was satisfied that the respondent had been notified of today�s hearing.� In the absence of any objection, on behalf of the claimant, the tribunal decided to proceed with the hearing of this claim.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.