Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Secretary of State is the appellant to this appeal but, for the sake of consistency, I refer to her as the respondent (as she was in the First-tier Tribunal) and to the original appellant as such.
The appellant is a 78 year old female citizen of Sri Lanka. In a determination promulgated on 30 July 2014 in the First-tier Tribunal, Judge Raymond allowed her appeal against the Entry Clearance Officer�s decision refusing her entry clearance to the United Kingdom for settlement as the adult dependent relative of her son. Her son is her sponsor and is a British citizen who is now resident and settled in the UK.
The judge heard oral evidence from the sponsor but at [24] of the determination he found that the sponsor was not a credible witness. He noted that there were two conflicting medical reports as to the health of the appellant and found that �the most credible explanation is that the sponsor has obtained a report from Dr Nagarajah which is an exaggeration�. At [25] the judge concluded in the following terms:
Permission to appeal was granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge T R P Hollingworth on 19 th September 2014 as follows:
�Seen alongside an adverse credibility of the UK sponsor (at paragraph 24) and wholly inconclusive medical evidence, the judge has attached undue weight to the appellant�s age and her claim not to have support in Sri Lanka as the basis for allowing the appeal under the Rules.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.