Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� At the Tribunal
DISTILLERY COMPANY LTD)��������������������������������������������������������������������������� APPELLANT
(1) UNITE THE UNION ����������������������������������������������������������������FIRST RESPONDENT
(2) PEOPLEFORWORK LIMITED������������������������������������������ SECOND RESPONDENT
The first respondent appealed arguing that the ET had erred in law by deciding that the first respondent had a duty to consult, as provided for in reg 13 (6), despite no such argument being before it;� that it erred in law in deciding that the first respondent had decided on the transfer due to the dispute or due to the managing director�s words; �that it erred in law in deciding that the information provided was not provided long enough before the transfer to enable consultation. �The second respondent supported the appeal.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.