Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous finding of the Tribunal is that the respondent unlawfully discriminated against the applicant on the grounds of her sex. The Tribunal orders the respondent to pay to the applicant by way of compensation the sum of �3,841.40.
The applicant was represented by Ms M Higgins, Barrister-at-law, instructed by Copeland McCaffrey, Solicitors
The respondent was represented by Mr T Bolton, Solicitor of Tughan & Co, Solicitors
Mr Bolton indicated that he had no objection to the said application and in the circumstances the Tribunal allowed the said application to amend the application as set out above.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.