Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Harry Langford (instructed by Freemans Solicitors) Applicant Father Jonathan Evans (instructed by Brethertons LLP) Respondent Mother Hearing dates: 11-13 December 2024 ____________________
(1) He had agreed to a temporary and not a permanent relocation, and he fully expected the children to be returned to the USA on 12 April 2024.
(1) The parties had agreed that the move to the UK on 09 December 2023 was a permanent relocation for the children: they would live full-time with M, and F would seek to organise his work such that he could spend as much time as possible with M and the children in the South of England.
(3) Alternatively, if Article 3 is engaged, then M relies on the following Article 13 defences:
and the court should exercise its discretion so as to refuse to make a return order.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.