Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, [the Appellant] ( and/or any member of his family, expert, witness or other person the Tribunal considers should not be identified ) is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant ( and/or other person ). Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              The Appellant appeals against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Burnett dismissing his protection claim. The decision was promulgated on 26 th May 2023.
              The Appellant applied for permission to appeal against that decision which was granted by Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan in the following terms:
The judge found it undermining of the appellant's credibility that he did not adduce corroborative evidence about going AWOL or to confirm his length of service. The judge arguably erred by failing to address whether such evidence could reasonably have been obtained by the appellant.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.