Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr M Mansfield QC and Mr H Hill (instructed by Birnberg Peirce & Partners) appeared on behalf of the Claimant Mr N Hillard QC and Mr J Hough appeared on behalf of the Defendant ____________________
Lord Bingham explains that it was necessary to interpret the word "how" in each of those provisions in a broader sense than previously considered "namely as meaning not simply "by what means" but "by what means and in what circumstances" (paragraph 35).
He said in respect of this rule and of Rule 36(2) and section 11(5)(b)(ii) of the Coroners Act 1988 to which I have already referred:
In that case the Coroner went on to explain that any explanation of the verdict was a matter for the jury to decide. The jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing and added a recommendation about banning replica firearms.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.