Public Law

FD, R (On the Application Of) v X Metropolitan Borough Council

[2019] EWHC Admin 3481High Court (Administrative)2019

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Public Law cases →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

Sarah Kilvington (instructed by Bromleys Solicitors LLP) for the Claimant Julien Foster (instructed by X Metropolitan Borough Council) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 22/11/19 ____________________

Part of the context of this letter is said to be that FD was keen not to be moved to a placement that had been proposed but subsequently rejected. I do not doubt that FD was in a very difficult situation.

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Public Law cases

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v DS

[2025] UKUT 168 (AAC)

Ranpariya v Government of India

[2026] EWHC Admin 682

Modi v Government of India

[2026] EWHC Admin 716

Rupert Lowe MP, R (on the application of) v The Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme

[2026] EWHC 406 (Admin)

Christopher Rokos, R (on the application of) v The Commissioners for HMRC

[2026] EWHC 733 (Admin)

KP, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor

[2026] EWHC Admin 735

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.