Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LADY JUSTICE KING LORD JUSTICE DAVID RICHARDS and LORD JUSTICE MOYLAN ____________________
Richard Todd QC and Lily Mottahedan (instructed by Vardags Solicitors) for the Appellant The First Respondent appeared in person The Second Respondent did not appear and was not represented The Third Respondent did not appear and was not represented The Fourth Respondent appeared in person The Fifth Respondent did not appear and was not represented Stewart Leech QC and Sarah Phipps (instructed by Lee and Thompson LLP) for the 6th Respondent Ruth Hughes (instructed by The Government Legal Department) for the 7th Respondent Hearing dates : 31 January to 2 February 2017 ____________________
i) Fund grants for research of endangered and vulnerable wild cats around the world.
The balance of the objects prescribe for the manner in which the objects are to be furthered. Broad provision is made to 'establish, support or aid' 'trusts, associations or institutions' in any way connected with or furthering the objects of the charity.
v) Whether the funds within those trusts could only be utilised for tiger conservation.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.