Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Although this is strictly an appeal by the Secretary of State I have, for the sake of consistency, continued the headings as in the First‑tier Tribunal so that in this decision the original appellants continue to be called the appellants.
The Secretary of State has appealed, with permission, against the decision of First‑tier Tribunal Judge Camp who allowed the appeals of the three appellants, all citizens of Cameroon, to the extent only that he found the original decisions to be not in accordance with the law and he remitted the applications to the respondent for lawful decisions.
Permission to appeal was given on 29 January 2015 by First‑tier Tribunal Judge Omotosho who quoted the first ground seeking permission to appeal and referred to the Upper Tribunal decision in T (Section 55 BCIA 2009 � entry clearance) Jamaica [2011] UKUT 483 which has held that Section 55 of the 2009 Act does not apply to children who are outside the United Kingdom.
In making his submissions, Mr Nath relied on the grounds and on the case of T Jamaica . He also relied on paragraph (iv) of the head note to T Jamaica which states as follows:
�Where the appeal can be fairly determined on the merits by the judge, it is inappropriate to allow it without substantive consideration simply for a decision to be made in accordance with the law.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.