Employment

Edwards v Ferguson

[2005] NIIT 2187_00Industrial Tribunal (NI)2005

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Employment cases →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

The applicant was represented by Mr D O'Sullivan Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Bogue & McNulty, Solicitors.

had no entitlement to any notice of termination of employment, whether under Article 118 or otherwise.

discretion by deciding not to make any order of the type contemplated by Article 44(4).

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Employment cases

Alpha Anne and Ors v Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust

[2026] EAT 15

A v B, the Organisation & Ors

[2026] EAT 35

Halley v Lady Smith & Anor (Disability Discrimination; Status of counsel to a public inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005)

[2026] UKEAT 56

Pasha v The Home Office

[2026] UKEAT 42

Prasad v Epsom and St Helier Hospital NHS Trust & Anor (Whistleblowing, Protected Disclosures, Race and Sex Discrimination, Victimisation)

[2026] UKEAT 22

H Fullah v Medical Research Council & Ors

[2026] EAT 28

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.