Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal by the appellant against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal to dismiss his appeal against the respondent's decision of 26 March 2014 refusing his application for leave to remain on the basis of his family and private life in the UK.
On 9 April 2014 the appellant appealed against the respondent's decision to the First-tier Tribunal. In a decision promulgated on 10 September 2015 First-tier Tribunal Judge Housego dismissed the appellant's appeal. The judge found that the appeal had no merit. In considering the position of the appellant's children the judge found that it would be reasonable for them to go to Pakistan.
Ms Mallick at the commencement of the hearing indicated that she wished to apply for permission to amend the grounds of appeal to add a further ground which in essence was that the judge accepted the evidence of Ms Hussain and yet made contrary findings against her without giving any reasons why.
The grounds of appeal are against the judge's findings in relation to [S]. There is no appeal against the decision in respect of the appellant, his wife or their son Bilal.
I accept that it appears that the judge has focused on the problems arising from the bilingual home environment when assessing the extent of [S]'s difficulties. For example, in paragraph 86 the judge finds:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.