Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent : Ms A Jones, counsel (instructed by Dhogal Partners Solicitors)
For the sake of convenience, I shall refer to the appellant as the Secretary of State, and the respondent as �the claimant.�
The claimant appealed against a decision of the respondent dated 1 st May 2013 to refuse to vary his leave to remain in the UK as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrant. The Secretary of State was not satisfied that the claimant had demonstrated that he had access to �200,000 as required by Appendix A.
In a decision promulgated on 28 th April 2014, the First-tier Tribunal Judge allowed the appeal. The Secretary of State had awarded the claimant no points for attributes: Appendix A. He supplied a bank letter from Habibi Bank Ltd � HBL- together with a third party declaration showing that he had access to more than �200,000.
However, the letter from HBL did not state his name on it or confirm the amount of money available to him as required by the Tier 1 policy guidance.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.