Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Transcript of Epiq Europe Limited Lower Ground, 20 Furnival Street, London, EC4A 1JS Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Email: [email protected] (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Andrew Ayres KC (instructed by Rosling King LLP) for the Claimant The Defendants appeared in person via Microsoft Teams Hearing date: 2 August 2023 ____________________
i) The court needs personal jurisdiction over the respondent to grant relief. Deutsche�Bank �50(1).
ii) The party seeking an�anti-suit injunction must generally show that the proceedings before the foreign court are or would be vexatious or oppressive: Deutsche�Bank �50(2).
iii) An�anti-suit injunction always requires caution, and indeed "extreme caution", because by definition it involves interference with the process or potential process of a�foreign court. The stronger the connection of the foreign court with the parties and the subject matter of the dispute, the stronger the argument against intervention: Bank�of�Tokyo�v�Karoon [1987] 1 AC 45, p.�59; Deutsche�Bank �50(5).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.