Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
MR. C. HALE� (instructed by Withers LLP) appeared on behalf of the Applicant (Wife). MR. M. GLASER� (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) appeared on behalf of the Respondent (Husband). ____________________
These replies are dated 4th February, 2009 and certainly indicate that the husband and his family continued to occupy the property at that date.�
She exhibits to her affidavit registration documents relating to the husband's cars.�
She exhibits a number of photographs which appear to show items still in the property bearing the family name or initials.�
I am obviously reading from a translation.� The husband was authorised to commence divorce proceedings.� In addition, he was ordered to pay a contribution to the maintenance and education of the two minor children at the rate of �1,000 per month each.� The order also records that the wife and children were to move to live in England.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.