Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO Official Shorthand Writers and Tape Transcribers Quality House, Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737 [email protected]
MR. M. POINTER QC and MR. G. KINGSCOTE (instructed by Family Law in Partnership LLP) appeared on behalf of the Applicant. MISS L. STONE QC and MR. D. BROOKS (instructed by Kingsley Napley LLP) appeared on behalf of the Respondent. ____________________
Having then gone on to talk about the matrimonial home, Lord Nicholls continued at para.23:
F: THE TWO SUB-ISSUES: THE TREATMENT OF LATENT CGT AND THE DATE FOR COMPUTING THE 'KITTY'
Later the same year, in Cowan v. Cowan [2001] 2 FLR 192 , Thorpe LJ said at para.70:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.