Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The judgment is being distributed on the strict understanding that in any report no person other than the advocates or the solicitors instructing them (and other persons identified by name in the judgment itself) may be identified by name or location and that in particular the anonymity of the children and the adult members of their family must be strictly preserved.
The applicant, mother, appeared in person Alev Giz and Frances Orchover represented the respondent, father, on 1st, 3rd and 8th July; otherwise he appeared in person Mark Twomey represented the first intervenor, Z County Council Sarah Morgan QC and Samantha Little represented X, the second intervenor Paul Storey QC and Camille Habboo represented A by her Children's Guardian, Sara Franklin Hearing dates: 1st � 9th and 11th July 2013 ____________________
X's affect � as reported by others in relation to complaints made in 2009 and 2010
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.