Quigley v Rosa Ltd

The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant�s claims are well-founded and the tribunal Orders the respondent to pay to the claimant compensation as follows:-

The tribunal heard oral evidence from the claimant, there being no appearance by or on behalf of the respondent.� The tribunal noted the content of the documentation that was before it at hearing.��

In her claim to the tribunal dated 27 May 2009 and received by the Office of Tribunals on 2 June 2009, the claimant claimed breach of contract, redundancy payment and unauthorised deduction of wages.� There was no response made to the claim.� The issue to be determined by the tribunal was whether or not the claimant�s claims as set out in the claim form and pursued at hearing were well-founded. �If so, the appropriate order to be made by the tribunal had to be determined.

In consequence of the evidence before it, the tribunal on the balance of probabilities determined the following material facts:-

(b) Also uncontroverted was the claimant's assertion that she was due 21.5 days� holiday pay at termination of employment and the tribunal accepts that to be the case.� At the date of termination of employment the claimant was aged 49 years and she had completed 17 years� service.�