Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr Spurling, of counsel, instructed by Bond Adam LLP Solicitors
       The appellant is a citizen of Nepal and the son of a former Gurkha soldier (the "sponsor"). He appealed against a decision of First Tier Tribunal Judge Swinnerton (the "FTJ") promulgated on 23 December 2023, which dismissed his appeal against refusal of entry clearance as an adult dependent child of a former Gurkha.
       The appellant's human rights claim was based on the family life said to exist between himself and the sponsor, as well as on the basis of the historic injustice relating to children of former Gurkha soldiers.
       Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Haria (the "DUTJ") set aside the decision of the FTJ on the basis of an error of law in a decision promulgated on 14 August 2024, and directed that the decision should be remade in the Upper Tribunal.
       The following findings of fact were preserved by the DUTJ at [44]:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.