Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The appellant appeals against the decision of a judge of the First-tier Tribunal (the judge) allowing his appeal against the respondent's decision dated 18 April 2024 on Article 8 grounds but dismissing his appeal on protection grounds. The respondent cross-appeals against the decision to allow the appellant's appeal on Article 8 grounds.
             The respondent appealed on the sole ground that the judge had failed to give adequate reasons for finding that the appellant faced very significant obstacles to reintegration. Permission to appeal was granted by the First-tier Tribunal.
             Mr Schwenk submitted that the appellant's mental health was not the sole reason for the judge's finding of very significant obstacles; on the contrary, he submitted, it was a 'make weight'. As it was, the judge had before her GP records and was entitled to make the findings she did on his mental. All in all, it was open to the judge to conclude that the appellant did indeed face very significant obstacles to reintegration into Albania.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.