Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Judicial Review of a decision by the United Kingdom Border Agency on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Home Department dated 23 June 2011 denying the petitioner refugee status
"45. The appeal on asylum grounds is allowed to the extent that the Appellant has established a well founded fear of persecution if the Respondent returns him to Uganda, but it is dismissed in respect of his claim that he has a well founded fear of persecution if returned by the Respondent to Ghana.
The appeal on human rights grounds under Article 8(1) of the ECHR is dismissed."
The immigration judge's conclusion on the facts in relation to the asylum claim included the following:
"I find that [ the petitioner ] has failed to establish a well founded fear of persecution if he were returned to Ghana, which, in effect, had been his home country from 1982-2003 (when he came to and later stayed illegally in the United Kingdom)."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.