Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant appeals a decision of the First-tier Tribunal which dismissed an appeal by her on asylum and human rights grounds against a decision to remove her from the UK in accordance with s. 47 Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006.
The appellant was then served with a decision to remove her pursuant to s. 10 Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 dated 6 th February 2013; the notice of decision stated that she did not have an �in country right of appeal�. On 21 st February 2013 she submitted, through her then legal representatives, grounds of appeal and an application to extend time. On 22 nd February 2013 the duty judge extended time and confirmed that the appellant had a valid in country right of appeal.
The appellant�s appeal against the decision dated 6 th February 2013 is the subject of these proceedings. It was heard and determined by First-tier Tribunal Judge Napthine on 3 rd September 2013. By a determination promulgated on 17 th September 2013 he dismissed her appeal on all grounds.
Permission to appeal that decision was granted by UTJ Allen on 16 th January 2014.
The grounds seeking permission submitted, in essence, that the judge had failed to approach the evidence correctly. Although he had referred to Deevaseelan [2002] UKIAT 00282 it was asserted that he had failed to correctly apply the guidance. In particular
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.