Skip to main content

Search Notes Common Room Case Library Flashcards Quizzes Past Papers SQE Tutors Leaderboard

Home›Case Library›YZ, R (on the application of) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police (Rev 1)

Public Law

YZ, R (on the application of) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police (Rev 1)

[2021] EWHC Admin 1060High Court (Administrative)2021

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Public Law cases →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

HIS HONOUR JUDGE JARMAN QC Sitting as a judge of the High Court ____________________

Mr Ramby de Mello (instructed by Instalaw Solicitors) for the claimant Ms Amy Clarke (instructed by South Wales Police Legal Services) for the defendant Hearing dates: 19 March 2021 ____________________

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

Official
Read on National Archives
Official UK government case law repository
Mirror
Read on BAILII
British and Irish Legal Information Institute
Web
Find via Google
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately

More Public Law cases

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v DS

[2025] UKUT 168 (AAC)

Oliver Perrin, R (on the application of) v North Devon District Council

[2026] EWHC 535 (Admin)

Trail Riders Fellowship v Lincolnshire County Council

[2026] EWHC 88 (Admin)

National Crime Agency v GKC (No 1)

[2026] EWHC 573 (Admin)

RB v Secretary of State for Defence

[2026] UKUT 117 (AAC)

YC v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

[2026] UKUT 128 (AAC)

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

Log in to comment. Discussions are part of the Common Room.

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

caselaw

AI-generated briefs should be verified against the source judgment. This tool is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

[email protected]

StudyCase Library Browse A–Z Notes Flashcards Quizzes Past Papers Guides Blog Topics

ToolsAll tools OSCOLA Case Finder Glossary Court hierarchy LLB SQE1 Oxford BA

CaselawAbout How it works Pricing For universities For law firms FAQ Changelog Contact Press

TrustSecurity Accessibility Status Terms Privacy Acceptable use Refunds Sign up

Used by Oxford law students·Powered by Anthropic AI·Cases from The National Archives·Payments by Stripe·GDPR Compliant

SQE revision content is produced by Caselaw independently. Caselaw is not affiliated with the SRA, Kaplan, or any official SQE provider. Refunds · Terms

© 2026 caselaw. All rights reserved.