Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant appeals with permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge S. Aziz promulgated on 9 March 2020 to, dismissing his appeal under the Immigration European Area) Regulations against a decision of the respondent to refuse to issue him with a residence card confirming his right of residence as the spouse of a French citizen exercising Treaty Rights in the United Kingdom.
The appellant's case is that he was married to a French National by proxy, the ceremony being carried out in Nigeria. The respondent did not accept that the marriage was valid, nor was she satisfied that the appellant's spouse was employed as claimed.
The appeal was determined without a hearing. The judge was not satisfied by the documentary evidence provided that the appellant's wife is employed as only photocopies has been provided, and that even had they been originals, he would not have been satisfied that she is employed as claimed [26]. The judge also found that the marriage was not valid, again on the basis that only photocopies of documents had been provided and he was not even satisfied that the marriage had taken place [28].
The appellant sought permission to appeal on the grounds that the judge had erred
(i) In failing to take into account the photocopies as evidence given that the directions expressly stated that only photocopies were to be send to the First-tier Tribunal;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.