Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 4 May 2001 Before
It is clear from the Decision of the Employment Tribunal that they drew a distinction between acknowledged changes in the organisation of the employers, and changes in the Respondent's role within the organisation. They draw a clear distinction between those earlier incidents which they do not suggest constituted a detriment, as far as the Applicant was concerned, and subsequent events which took place after she had told her employers about her pregnancy. These appear in paragraph 38. They say that they were satisfied that her employers were treating her as:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.