Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            The Appellant is a national of Pakistan, born on 1 January 1959, who on 2 February 2022 applied for leave to remain on family and private life grounds.
            The Respondent refused her application in a decision sent out on 1 June 2022 because:
            The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal on 14 June 2022 and her appeal was listed before Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Sweet (hereinafter referred to as the FTTJ) on 26 April 2023 and in a decision promulgated on 29 April 2021 the FTTJ allowed the appeal.
            Permission to appeal was granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Chohan on 31 May 2022 and the matter came before Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Alis (hereinafter referred to as DUTJ) on 5 October 2023.
            Having heard submissions from both Mr McVeety on behalf of the Respondent and Ms Bhachu, DUTJ concluded there had been an error in law in relation to article 8 ECHR because:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.