Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr Hussain, instructed by McManus Seddon Runhams, Solicitors
The Secretary of State now appeals, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal. In essence, the appeal turns on the question of the sponsor�s income (which the Secretary of State does not dispute is adequate to meet the Rules) and his failure to satisfy the specific provisions of the Rules.
The determination of the First-tier Tribunal promulgation on 24 June 2014 is set aside. I remake the decision. The appeal is dismissed under the Immigration Rules. The appeal is dismissed on human rights grounds (Article 8 ECHR).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.