Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
HIS HONOUR JUDGE ROBINSON sitting as a Judge of the High Court ____________________
Adam Weitzman KC and Patricia Leonard (instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP) for The Claimant James Todd KC (instructed by DWF LLP) for The Defendant Hearing date: 18 September 2023 ____________________
(1) On the form of the award of damages, namely a lump sum and a Periodical Payments Order (PPO) providing for annual Periodical Payments (PPs) in respect of care and case management index linked, in the usual way, to the 80 th centile of the relevant wage inflation indices published by the ONS, which in this case is ASHE 6135 and 6136.
(2) The figures for the lump sum and the initial annual PP, namely �6.25m and �325,000 respectively.
(3) That the lump sum award shall be a provisional award to reflect the risk of a syrinx developing. If that does occur, it is agreed that it cannot be treated, and the Claimant may return to Court to seek further damages.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.