Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In conclusion, Mr Khan conceded that the Judge had taken into consideration the appellant's affidavit in paragraph 36 of the decision.
After considering the matter for a few moments I announced that I had concluded that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal does not show a material error on a point of law and shall stand. My reasons for that conclusion follow.
Bearing in mind the finding that the marriage was not genuine it was not incumbent upon the Judge to consider Article 8 issues based upon a spousal relationship which had been found not to exist.
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal does not show a material error on a point of law and shall stand.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.