Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 17 September 2001 Before
So far as the protected disclosure is concerned the Employment Tribunal found that he did not make such a disclosure until after his dismissal in a letter dated 2 August. It followed that his making the allegations in that letter however true or false they may have been could not have been a reason for his dismissal which preceded it.
That does not answer the question as to whether by using the word conduct both aspects, one being the assertion of statutory right and the second being his inter-personal behaviour within the office, were included, albeit in different degrees. But the Tribunal went on at paragraph�10(viii) to say this:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.